Tuesday, June 19, 2007

A Lott To Think About

With the presidential election coming up next year, it’s time to start figuring out which candidate most deserves your vote. And the only way to do that, obviously, is by tuning in to Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to see which candidate they are supporting. We average Americans are clearly not smart enough to make an important decision like that on our own. No, we must listen to talk radio and then follow their particular marching orders without any reservations. It’s so nice not to have to think for ourselves. We just incline our ears toward the radio and process the information like robots that can do nothing but follow their master’s instructions.

Let’s face it; the average American is dumb as a brick. OK, I don’t actually believe that, but that’s what Mississippi Senator Trent Lott seems to believe. He gives the impression that the powerful talk radio hosts are controlling people’s thoughts and actions, so much so that he wants something done about it. Last week, Senator Lott said, “Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem.”

His implication? That Americans aren’t smart enough to make up their own minds, and talk radio is essentially running the country by methodically brainwashing the masses. Therefore, something must be done immediately to deprogram the indoctrinated multitudes and stop talk radio from further taking over America.

Maybe I read too much into Senator Lott’s comments, but it sounds eerily similar to the recent cries from the left to bring back the Fairness Doctrine. I guess when Air America (a liberal talk radio network) proved to be a miserable failure; they had to find some other way to stem the tide of right-wing voices that are so prominent on the airwaves. Should the Fairness Doctrine be revived, it will have a chilling effect on free speech in this country. Talk radio programs would be forced off the air because they don’t meet a certain politically correct standard. Conservative talk radio would become a thing of the past and liberal talk radio would, well, nothing would really change since there’s never actually been a truly successful liberal talk show on the radio.

So why is the conservative senior senator from Mississippi coming out now and attacking talk radio? Well, he’s unhappy with how the industry has framed the debate over the illegal immigration bill. Senator Lott, for reasons unknown, is a big supporter of this amnesty plan. And he seems to think that talk radio, that massive entity that is “running the country,” is having a direct effect on how Americans feel about this bill.

Memo to Senator Lott:

I lived in Mississippi for four years. I even voted for you while I was living there. You’re a good man. You’ve been a good senator. I haven’t always agreed with you on everything, but for the most part I think you’re a stand-up guy. So please know my heart when I break the following news to you:

I DON’T NEED RUSH LIMBAUGH AND SEAN HANNITY TO TELL ME HOW I SHOULD FEEL ABOUT A BILL THAT GIVES LEGAL STATUS TO PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE ILLEGALLY! I DON’T NEED NEAL BOORTZ AND MICHAEL SAVAGE TO EXPLAIN TO ME THE PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH PUTTING THESE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ON A PATH TO CITIZENSHIP! I’M PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF THINKING FOR MYSELF AND FORMING A PERSONAL OPINION WITHOUT THE VOICES OF LAURA INGRAHAM OR MARK LEVIN TELLING ME WHAT TO BELIEVE!

There, I’ve said it. Sorry for shouting, but you know how worked up we talk radio listeners can get sometimes. Please senator, if you think something needs to be done about talk radio, don’t join forces with Teddy Kennedy to do it. In fact, don’t do anything. Leave it alone. Talk radio isn’t running this country, and the American people aren’t nearly as uninformed as you elites in Washington seem to think we are.

Respectfully,
Shane Lambert

P.S. Have a nice day!


Anybody think I’ll hear back from him?

18 comments:

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

Mega-dittoes from me!

Bill said...

How on Earth do you make the assumption that, should the Fairness Doctrine be reestablished, Conservative radio programs that do not meet the "standard" will be taken off the air? Have you even read the proposed legislation?

The bill does nothing more than require broadcasters -- who lease the public's airwaves, they don't own them -- to make certain that issues of public import and interest get a comprehensive airing, which means including different viewpoints. There's no requirement that individual programs do this, by the way. It could easily be accomplished by airing programs whose hosts hold differing viewpoints.

I'm constantly amazed at how people on the left and the right have their panties all twisted over this. What exactly is it about free speech and possibly having to defend your points of view that has you so scared?

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Bill,

I don't think the federal government should be in the business of telling radio stations what kind of programs they HAVE to air just to provide a differing viewpoint. That's not free speech; it is coerced speech.

If radio stations are forced to air certain programs to provide a balance, it will mean that some other programs will have to be eliminated from their programming line-up. By doing this, some successful programs will be replaced with less successful programs just because the government says it has to be this way.

Again, that's not freedom. But thank you for helping me make my point.

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Did any of my fellow "Fletch" fans catch the little "Fletchism" that I threw in this column?

Jeff, I thought sure I'd hear from you about this one.

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

Harry S. Truman was a good man, too!
Fletch rules!

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Not bad, Jeff. Unfortunately, that's not the "Fletchism" I was talking about.

Keep trying.

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Jeff,

Maybe there's some things happening here that you should become aware of.

It's nothing of the deceptive nature, I assure you.

Boy, what in the world is the matter with you. Of course it's in there. It's a direct quote.

Is trying to figure this out going to drive you crazy?

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

Leave it alone, Fletch. Or should I say, Jane Doe?

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Was that line even in the movie?

Sorry, you're way off base with that one.

Give up yet?

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

No. Never. Never.

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Marvin, Velma, and everyone in Provo will be proud of you for your persistance.

You'll get it.

Eventually.

And when you do, you're going to kick yourself.

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

There, I've said it?

Shane "George" Lambert said...

OK, let me reiterate that this is the move Fletch that I'm talking about. You know, F-L-E-T-C-H, Fletch.

Either you forgot that fact or you're just taking wild guesses.

Nevertheless, I still believe you'll figure it out.

Shane "George" Lambert said...

Want a hint?

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

Are you sure it is a DIRECT quote? I'm so ashamed of myself...

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

AAAARRRRGGGHHHH! You were right!

But you won't be able to read about this in tomorrow's paper.
Sincerely yours,
Jeffrey A. Brooks

P.S. Have a nice day!

Shane "George" Lambert said...

BINGO!!!

"P.S. Have a nice day!"

I knew you could do it.

I believe that entitles you to two plane tickets to Rio. Just call Frank, he'll arrange it all for you.

Jeff Brooks / TwoTwenty Ministries said...

I'll charge it to Mr. Underhill's American Express.
Want the number?